SKIL RAS800 vs RAS900

Below I will compare the power, portability, and features of the SKIL RAS800 and RAS900

Difference between SKIL RAS800 and RAS900

The technical summary sheet for SKIL RAS800 and RAS900

Design Comparison

The first router table, SKIL RAS800, measures 25.25 x 9.5 x 15.75 inches and weighs 21.4 pounds. Meanwhile, its counterpart, SKIL RAS900, has 28 x 9.25 x 17.75 inches in measurement and 31.4 pounds in weight.

As you can see from their dimensions and weights, SKIL RAS800 is more lightweight and compact than RAS900. Therefore, the winner in this round is RAS800.

Power Comparison

Before deciding to buy any tools, you should consider their essential specs.

First, the setting of SKIL RAS800 vs RAS900 needs several attachments, so the two devices possess accessory storage containers. With these containers, you can avoid losing accessories or breaking them by mishandling.

When it comes to Quick-Clamp System, RAS800 holds one bag for storage and includes four tool-less clamps while RAS900 has up to 2 containers, which release the router in seconds for faster and smoother bit changes without leveling. Hence, the winner in this battle is RAS900.

Besides, in the Feather Board performance, RAS900 comes up with two feather boards, but RAS800 only owns 1. Thanks to this feature, RAS900 makes your work easier, which means you can guide your workpiece through diverse sections and give it the form and dimension as you prefer.

Also, both SKIL RAS800 and RAS900 possess Bit Height Gauge to simplify set-up and improve the precision of cuts.

Finally, RAS800 and its brother, RAS900, own Starter Pin and Guard so that you can attach the workpieces with the starter pin to give it a stable position. This maintains its flow during the router is producing a chop onto it. As a result, you can efficiently transfer this router upon the rounded borders and smoothly perform around workpieces.

To sum up, SKIL RAS900 is the final winner because it has all the features of its counterpart, RAS800. Moreover, it holds noted outstanding characteristics that RAS800 does not have.

Features Comparison

From the specs of two router tables of the SKIL brand, you can realize their outstanding features.

The highlight of RAS800 is its bag for storage consisting of 4 tool-less clamps, which is convenient and useful as it can be kept on a shelf.

The outstanding characteristics that make RAS900 overwhelm its brother are two accessories bags and two feather gauge, but RAS 800 only has one container and one feather gauge.

Quick Rundown Of SKIL RAS800

[i2pc show_title=”false” title=”Pros & Cons” show_button=”false” pros_title=”Pros” cons_title=”Cons” ][i2pros]Fewer 4 clamping tools
Many storage options
Portable and lightweight design
A plug for vac included[/i2pros][i2cons]Not the best quality materials
Low throat piece
Not a good fit for professional woodworkers[/i2cons][/i2pc]

Quick Rundown Of Skil RAS900

[i2pc show_title=”false” title=”Pros & Cons” show_button=”false” pros_title=”Pros” cons_title=”Cons” ][i2pros]A flat top for easy cutting
An easier router attachment
Suitable for beginner woodworkers
Accurate and precise
Quick router table setup
Affordable price
[/i2pros][i2cons]Having difficulties plugging in the router.
Small surface
Not recommended to use much[/i2cons][/i2pc]

Conclusion

In general, RAS900 is the victor in the SKIL RAS800 vs RAS90 comparison. However, the final judgment will be dependable on your decision.

If you just do DIY jobs, let’s go for RAS800 because it is comfortable and pleasant to use and set up.

In case you need a router table having more complexity than RAS800, the right choice must be RAS900 due to the prominent characteristics mentioned above.

From my point of view, I would say that my beloved router table is RAS800, as I just need an easy-to-use tool for my DIY.